Research on Emergency Intelligence Risk Traceability from the Perspective of Three Dimensional Space

Authors

• Yizhou LIU, School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun, 130022
• Wei HUANG, School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun, 130022

Keywords

risk traceability, ternary space, emergency intelligence support, artificial intelligence technology, social governance, risk transmission, serious emergencies

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]How to leverage the high value of intelligent intelligence technology and services for risk traceability analysis in the context of large-scale emergency situations is an urgent challenge that needs to be addressed in the governance of risks in an intelligent society. [Method/process]Based on the theory of ternary space, the risk of emergencies is divided into three dimensions: physical space, social space, and information space. Intelligent intelligence technologies such as large model causal relationship extraction, complex network analysis, and natural language processing are applied to collect and analyze emergency intelligence. A risk traceability model is constructed for seven elements including event risk sources and environmental risk sources, and empirical research is conducted. [Result/conclusion]Physical spatial risk sources play a crucial role in the process of risk transmission to other spaces, with a relatively dense distribution in the early stages of risk outbreaks, while the distribution of risk sources in social and information spaces exhibits a phase lag effect with similar periodicity over time. The emotional risk sources in the information space are mostly located at the core of the node network, which is an important factor in triggering irrational behavior between nodes. The social spatial risk characteristics of information risk sources are not obvious.

First Page

122

Last Page

132

Submission Date

18-Nov-2024

Revision Date

27-Dec-2024

Acceptance Date

29-Nov-2024

Published Date

01-Apr-2025

Reference

[1] 刘昭阁, 李向阳, 乔立民, 等. 案例支持下城市灾害风险应对的大数据治理模式分析方法[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43 (06): 672-684.
[2] 袁玉, 樊博. 大数据驱动的应急资源布局研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12 (03): 35-43.
[3] KESAVAREDDIGARI H, SPENCER S, ERYILMAZ A, et al. Identification and asymptotic localization of rumor sources using the method of types[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2020, 7 (03): 1145-1157.
[4] BROCKMANN D, HELBING D. The hidden geometry of complex, network-driven contagion phenomena[J]. Science, 2013, 342 (6164): 1337-1342.
[5] WANG Z, WANG C, PEI J, et al. Multiple source detection without knowing the underlying propagation model[C]. Proceedings of Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017: 217-223.
[6] FEIZI S, MEDARD M, QUON G, et al. Network infusion to infer information sources in networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2019, 6 (03): 402-417.
[7] PRAKASH B A, VREEKEN J, FALOUTSOS C. Efficiently spotting the starting points of an epidemic in a large graph[J]. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2014, 38 (01): 35-59.
[8] 吴俊杰, 郑凌方, 杜文宇, 等. 从风险预测到风险溯源: 大数据赋能城市安全管理的行动设计研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36 (08): 189-202.
[9] 马海群, 张涛. 区块链赋能智能情报分析算法风险治理机制研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2023 (01): 48-56.
[10] 赵健雅, 陈峰, 郑文丽, 等. 美国供应链溯源应对中的信息安全问题及反竞争情报体系建构[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47 (03): 73-80.
[11] 安璐. 突发事件应急情报分析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2020, 10 (01): 14.
[12] 王晰巍, 王楠阿雪. 数智驱动的重大突发事件应急情报管理: 新机遇、新挑战、新趋势[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66 (16): 4-12.
[13] 李阳, 孙建军. 面向智慧应急的情报资源保障能力建构[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38 (12): 1310-1319.
[14] 蒋勋, 张志祥, 朱晓峰, 等. 大数据驱动智库应急决策的情报架构[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42 (08): 25-32, 16.
[15] SNIDARO L, VISENTINI I, BRYAN K. Fusing uncertain knowledge and evidence for maritime situational awareness via Markov Logic Networks.  Information Fusion. [J]. Information Fusion, 2015, 21 (01): 159–172.
[16] 姜永常, 满小莉, 王红露. 情境感知系统中基于概念格集成实现情境本体协同构建特性、原则与方法[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41 (06): 558-573.
[17] 孙钦莹, 马海群. 什么导致突发事件应急决策失效？: 情报视域下的组态分析[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42 (09): 1078-1091.
[18] LI S, LIU Z, LI Y. Temporal and spatial evolution of online public sentiment on emergencies[J]. Information Processing and Management, 2020, 57 (02): 102177.
[19] 卡尔·波普尔. 客观知识: 一个进化论的研究[M]. 舒炜光, 卓如飞, 周柏乔, 等译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2015.
[20] 朱文武, 王鑫. 三元空间大数据网络关联表征[J]. 中国科学: 信息科学, 2021, 51 (11): 1802-1839.
[21] 卢国强, 黄微, 杨佩霖. 基于风险耦合的突发事件网络舆情群体极化演化分析[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43 (03): 96-109.
[22] 乌尔里希·贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2017.
[23] 李纲, 刘学太, 巴志超. 三元世界理论再认知及其与国家安全情报空间[J]. 图书与情报, 2022 (01): 14-23.
[24] 刘逸伦, 黄微, 卢国强. 基于AHPSortⅡ的突发事件网络舆情群体极化风险评估研究[J]. 现代情报, 2024, 44 (05): 107-122.
[25] 王秉, 史志勇, 徐方廷. 安全信息视域下的三元空间安全事件链防控[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42 (06): 119-123, 169.
[26] 古斯塔夫·勒庞. 乌合之众[M]. 徐苑琳, 译. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2022.
[27] 杨洸, 郭中实. 数字新闻生态下的信息失序: 对数据主义的反思[J]. 新闻界, 2021 (11): 14-21, 31.
[28] 孙智中. 大数据时代的开源情报: 特征及流程[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2022 (07): 15-24.
[29] 孙悦. 社交媒体平台用户参与行为谱构建与行为强度测度研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2023.
[30] NEWMAN M E J. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2004, 69 (06): 0666133.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2025.02.011

Recommended Citation

LIU, Yizhou and HUANG, Wei (2025) "Research on Emergency Intelligence Risk Traceability from the Perspective of Three Dimensional Space," Journal of Scientific Information Research: Vol. 7: Iss. 2, Article 11.
DOI: 10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2025.02.011
Available at: https://eng.kjqbyj.com/journal/vol7/iss2/11