Scientific Information Research
Keywords
research cooperation, cooperation model, artificial intelligence, research team, comparative study
Abstract
[Purpose/significance]The paper explores the regional cooperation and their differences in artificial intelligence research teams.It is helpful to reveal the status and strategies of scientific cooperation models across regions or within regions.[Method/process]This paper was based on the publication data of the Web of Science category Computer Science，Artificial Intelligence from 2009 to 2018，and did data cleaning via programming and manual check，and extract and identify research teams from multiple dimensions.Then，this paper divides three types of cooperation models by regional.It comprehensively analyzes the three aspects of geographical distribution，internal cooperation indicators，and cooperation topics in the research teams from the perspective of comparisons.At the same time，It also highlights the comparison of AI research teams in China and the United States.[Result/conclusion]The research results show that：Chinese and foreign AI research maintains close ties with major scientific research countries；Chinese domestic cooperation is highly dependent，and international cooperation is conducive to crossing into the leading team；China's domestic AI cooperation research is mainly manifested in the data processing and application level，while the core technology level and basic algorithm level need to cooperate with foreign countries；Both China and the United States occupy an important position in international cooperation and they are close partners with each other.
First Page
1
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2020.04.001
Recommended Citation
WANG, Yue-fen; CAO, Jia-jun; YU, Hou-qiang; and Kwoh, Chee Keong
(2020)
"The Collaboration State and Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence Research Teams in Terms of Regional Cooperation from the Regional Perspective,"
Scientific Information Research: Vol. 2:
Iss.
4, Article 1.
DOI: 10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2020.04.001
Available at:
https://eng.kjqbyj.com/journal/vol2/iss4/1
Reference
[1] 马费成，陈柏彤.我国人文社会科学学科多样性研究[J].情报科学，2015，33（01）：3-8.
[2] ZHOU P，Glänzel W.In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science[J].Scientometrics，2010，82（03）：597-612.
[3] 金碧辉，RICHARD P SUTTMEIER，张望，等.中美科学合作：文献计量学分析[J].山西大学学报（自然科学版），2007（02）：295-302.
[4] 胡一竑，朱道立，张建同，等.中外科研合作网络对比研究[J].管理学报，2009，6（10）：1323-1329.
[5] 郭颍涛，杨思洛，邝飘.中外图书情报学科合作模式比较研究[J].情报理论与实践，2013，36（10）：120-123，128.
[6] 浦墨，袁军鹏，岳晓旭，等.国际合作科学计量研究的国际现状综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2015，36（06）：56-68.
[7] MELIN G.Impact of national size on research collaboration：A comparison between Northern European and American universities[J].Scientometrics，1999，46（01）：161-170.
[8] EUSTACHE M.International collaboration in scientific publishing：the case of West Africa （2001—2010）[J].Scientometrics，2013，96（03）：761-783.
[9] 邱均平，曾倩.国际合作是否能提高科研影响力：以计算机科学为例[J].情报理论与实践，2013，36（10）：1-5.
[10] LEE S，BOZEMAN B.The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity[J].Social studies of science，2005，35（05）：673-702.
[11] 王文平.基于科学计量的中国国际科技合作模式及影响研究[D].北京：北京理工大学，2014.
[12] 郭永正.中国和印度：国际科学合作的文献计量比较研究[D].大连：大连理工大学，2010.
[13] SALTON G，BERGMARK D.A citation study of computer science literature[J].IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication，1979，PC-22（03）：146-158.
[14] LUUKKONEN T，TIJSSEN R J W，PERSSON O，et al.The measurement of international scientific collaboration[J].Scientometrics，1993，28（01）：15-36.
[15] 袁平，王福利.一种T-S模糊系统建模方法[J].系统仿真学报，2006（04）：817-820.
[16] 印蔚蔚.基于YCbCr色彩空间的图像色偏检测方法[J].计算机时代，2017（09）：47-50.