Scientific Information Research
Keywords
military decision-making; intelligence analysis model; SWOT-AHP-TOPSIS; strategy formulation and selection
Abstract
[Purpose/significance]The high risk and high confrontation of military system lead to the special complexity of military decision-making analysis compared with other fields,which also puts forward higher requirements for the scientificity and rationality of military decision-making analysis.Proper military decision-making analyzing tools can play an effective auxiliary role in strategy formulation and selection.Therefore, it is particularly significant to choose scientific and reasonable military decision-making analyzing tools.[Method/process]Based on previous studies,this article introduces the SWOT-AHP-TOPSIS analysis model,a latest development form of the SWOT analysis,into military decision-making analysis,expounds its method, principle and analysis process,and takes the sea power control strategy of the coast guard of country A in island H as an example to carry on the actual operation and application to the analysis model.[Result/conclusion]Through method elaboration and case demonstration,the effectiveness of SWOT-AHP-TOPSIS analysis model in military decision analysis is determined,which enriches the selection of tools for military decision analysis.At the same time, it aims at the limitations exposed in the application process of the analysis model.The direction of future development and improvement provides a useful reference.
First Page
87
Recommended Citation
XU, Qianhui and WEN, Jie
(2021)
"Application Process and Value Evaluation of the SWOT-AHP-TOPSIS Analyzing Model in Military Decision-making Analysis,"
Scientific Information Research: Vol. 3:
Iss.
3, Article 7.
Available at:
https://eng.kjqbyj.com/journal/vol3/iss3/7
Reference
[1] 葛慧磊，余翔，李永垒.基于AHP-SWOT的中国卫星导航专利技术产业化发展战略研究[J].情报杂志，2019，38（05）：42-48，101. [2] 武小悦.决策分析理论[M].北京：科学出版社，2010. [3] 郁时炼，候立峰.适应未来战争需要加速推进军事决策科学化[J].现代管理科学，2001（02）：32-33. [4] 高金虎.试论信息时代的情报分析理论创新[J].情报杂志，2018，37（07）：1-6，15. [5] 黄瑞敏.基于SWOT分析的企业竞争情报实例研究：IBM公司建立竞争情报体系案例分析[J].现代情报，2007（01）：191-194. [6] 李玉平，吴红.基于AHP-SWOT法的专利战略因素分析及构建[J].情报杂志，2010，29（07）：40-44. [7] 卡尔·冯·克劳塞维茨.战争论[M].时殷弘，译.北京：商务印书馆，2018：191. [8] 罗伯特·克拉克.情报分析：以目标为中心的方法[M].马忠元，译.北京：金城出版社，2013：22. [9] 托马斯·吉洛维奇.社会心理学（第3版）[M].侯玉波，等译.北京：中国轻工业出版社，2016:10. [10] PAUL K.DAVIS.New Challenges for Defense Planning：Rethinking How Much Is Enough[M].Santa Monica：RAND Corp.，1994. [11] JONES MORGAN D.The Thinker's Toolkit：Fourteen Powerful Techniques for Problem Solving[M].New York：Three Rivers Press，1998. [12] 辛西娅·格拉博.预警情报手册：国家安全威胁评估[M].熊贵帆，宁洪波，姜磊，译.北京：金城出版社，2019：79. [13] SATTY T L.Modeling unstructured decision problems：the theory of analytical hierarchies[J].Mathematics Computers in Simulation，1978，20（03）：147-158. [14] 梁蕾.层次分析法的演进及其在竞争情报系统绩效评估中的应用[J].情报理论与实践，2015，38（12）：20-24. [15] HWANG C L，YOON K.Multiple Attribute Decision Making[M].Berlin：Springer-Verlag，1981. [16] 嘎日达.关于社会科学中量化研究的深层思考[J].北京行政学院学报，2006（03）：87-90. [17] 克劳塞维茨.战争论[M].李传训，译.北京：北京出版社，2007. [18] ROBERT M CLARK.Intelligence Analysis：A Target-centric Approach [M].Washington，DC：CQ Press，2006：10-15. [19] 张建东，荀烨.基于德尔菲-熵权值综合赋权的仓库物资保障能力模糊评估模型研究[J].物流技术，2019，38（10）：145-149. [20] LANDES DAVID S.The Wealth and Poverty of Nations[M].New York：W.W.Norton and Company，1998：577. [21] 易本胜，刑蓬宇.美军作战净评估方法分析[J].军事运筹与系统工程，2015，29（01）：18-24. [22] 陈敏，黄谦，李坎.SWOT-CLPV矩阵在战略博弈分析中的应用[J].指挥控制与仿真，2019，41（03）：14-18. [23] 杨艳艳.基于利益相关者视角的SWOT分析法研究[D].河南：河南大学，2013：20-21.