A Survey of Research Methods on Knowledge Exchange Efficiency of Academic Virtual Community

Authors

Shuqing LI, College of Information Engineering,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023
Lei MAO, Hunan Institute of Scientific and Technical Information,Changsha 410001
Zhihao YAN, College of Information Engineering,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023
Mingfeng JIANG, College of Information Engineering,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023

Keywords

academic virtual community; knowledge exchange; research methods; index design; literature research

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]This paper mainly summarizes the relevant contents, methods and conclusions of the research methods on the efficiency of knowledge exchange in domestic academic virtual community in recent years, and makes a more comprehensive summary of the traditional methods and new research methods.[Method/process]This paper mainly adopts the methods of literature review and comparative analysis to sort out a relatively complete research system of knowledge exchange efficiency of academic virtual community. [Result/conclusion]It can provide a relatively complete pre-research summary for the research on knowledge exchange in academic virtual community, and elaborate and introduce the research direction and content that need attention.

First Page

1

Last Page

12

Submission Date

August 2021

Revision Date

September 2021

Publication Date

4-1-2022

Recommended Citation

LI, Shuqing; MAO, Lei; YAN, Zhihao; and JIANG, Mingfeng (2022) "A Survey of Research Methods on Knowledge Exchange Efficiency of Academic Virtual Community," Scientific Information Research: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 1.
Available at: https://eng.kjqbyj.com/journal/vol4/iss1/1

Reference

[1] RHEINGOLD H. Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier [M]. New Jersey: Addison Wesley, 1993.
[2] MARTÍNEZ-LÓPEZ F J, ANAYA-SÁNCHEZ R, AGUILAR-ILLESCAS R, et al. Types of Virtual Communities and Virtual Brand Communities [M]. Cham: Springer, 2016.
[3] BLANCHARD A L, MARKUS M L. Sense of Virtual Community-Maintaining the Experience of Belonging [C] //Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2002.
[4] HAGEL J, ARMSTRONG A. Net Gain: Expanding markets through Virtual Community [M]. Mass: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
[5] 张海涛, 孙思阳, 任亮. 虚拟学术社区用户知识交流行为机理及网络拓扑结构研究 [J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36 (10): 137-142, 163.
[6] 毕强, 贯君, 赵夷平. 学术虚拟社区信息运动规律研究 [J]. 图书馆学研究, 2015 (07): 6-13.
[7] 徐美凤, 叶继元. 学术虚拟社区知识共享研究综述 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55 (13): 67-71, 125.
[8] LIU R, SHAO X. Understanding Knowledge Sharing Willingness in Virtual Academic Community: A Survey Study on College Students [M]. New York: Springer, 2013.
[9] 王东. 虚拟学术社区知识共享实现机制研究 [D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2010.
[10] 丁敬达, 杨思洛, 邱均平. 论学术虚拟社区知识交流模式 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36 (01): 64-68.
[11] 米哈依洛夫. 科学交流与情报学 [M]. 徐新民, 译. 北京: 科学技术出版社, 1980.
[12] D. 普赖斯. 小科学·大科学 [M]. 宋剑耕, 戴振飞, 译. 北京: 世界科学出版社, 1982.
[13] 盖璐璐. 基于小世界网络的非正式组织隐性知识共享效率研究 [D]. 南京: 南京邮电大学, 2013.
[14] PAN Y G, XU Y C, WANG X L, et al. Integrating social networking support for dyadic knowledge exchange: A study in a virtual community of practice [J]. Information & Management, 2015, 52 (01): 61-70.
[15] 陈为东, 王萍, 王美月. 学术虚拟社区用户社会性交互的影响因素模型与优化策略研究 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41 (06): 117-123.
[16] 徐美凤, 叶继元. 学术虚拟社区知识共享主体特征分析 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54 (22): 111-114, 148.
[17] WENSLEY A. Book review: Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know [J]. Knowledge & Process Management, 1998, 5 (01): 65-66.
[18] LAI H M, CHEN T T. Knowledge sharing in interest online communities: A comparison of posters and lurkers [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 35 (06): 295-306.
[19] FAZEY I, BUNSE L, MSIKA J, et al. Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 25 (01): 204-220.
[20] YANG S M, FANG S C, FANG S R, et al. Knowledge exchange and knowledge protection in interorganizational learning: The ambidexterity perspective [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2014, 43 (02): 346-358.
[21] PARRA C. Virtual teaching in postgraduate programmes: the importance of social collaboration in virtual communities [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017, 237 (22): 1430-1438.
[22] 胥伟岚. 基于人际网络的学术社交网络知识交流模式研究 [J]. 图书馆学研究, 2018 (13): 13-18.
[23] 王翠萍, 戚阿阳. 微博用户学术信息交流行为调查 [J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018, 38 (03): 125-132.
[24] 周春雷. 链接内容分析视角下的科学网博客评价探索 [J]. 图书情报知识, 2012 (04): 11-17.
[25] 庞建刚, 吴佳玲. 基于SFA方法的虚拟学术社区知识交流效率研究 [J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36 (05): 104-109.
[26] 刘晓娟, 刘新哲. 虚拟学术群组特征研究: 以用户为分析视角 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59 (24): 83-92.
[27] 张红兵, 张乐. 学术虚拟社区知识贡献意愿影响因素的实证研究: KCM和TAM视角 [J]. 软科学, 2017, 31 (08): 19-24.
[28] 杨瑞仙, 黄书瑞, 于政杰. 基于三阶段DEA模型的学术虚拟社区知识交流效率评价研究 [J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40 (03): 256-266.
[29] 宗乾进, 吕鑫, 袁勤俭, 等. 学术博客的知识交流效果评价研究 [J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32 (12): 72-76.
[30] 万莉. 学术虚拟社区知识交流效率测度研究 [J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34 (09): 170-173.
[31] 吴佳玲. 虚拟学术社区知识交流效率研究 [D]. 绵阳: 西南科技大学, 2019.
[32] 杨瑞仙, 权明喆, 武亚倩, 等. 学术虚拟社区科研人员知识交流效率感知调查研究 [J]. 图书与情报, 2018 (06): 72-83.
[33] CHEN C J, HUNG S W. To give or to receive?Factors influencing members'knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities [J]. Information & Management, 2010, 47 (04): 226-236.
[34] WANG C C, LAI C Y. Knowledge contribution in the online virtual community: capability and motivation [C] //International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. Springer-Verlag, 2006: 442-453.
[35] XIAO H L, LI W F, CAO X B, et al. The Online Social Networks on Knowledge Exchange: Online Social Identity, Social Tie and Culture Orientation [J]. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 2012, 15 (02): 4-24.
[36] GANG K W, RAVICHANDRAN T. Exploring the Determinants of Knowledge Exchange in Virtual Communities [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2015, 62 (01): 89-99.
[37] 晋升. 基于DEA方法的学术虚拟社区知识交流效率研究 [D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2019.
[38] 方洁, 龚立群, 张亚军. 基于知识接受者视角的虚拟团队知识共享行为研究 [J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2013 (12): 60-63.
[39] 钟玲玲, 王战平, 谭春辉. 虚拟学术社区用户知识交流影响因素研究 [J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38 (03): 137-144.
[40] ZHOU T, LU Y B, WANG B．Integrating TTF and UTAUT to Explain Mobile Banking User Adoption [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 26 (04): 760-767.
[41] 李琳, 黄海军, 汪寿阳. 基于DEA/AR博弈交叉效率方法的学术期刊评价研究 [J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19 (04): 118-126.
[42] TÜSELMANN H, SINKOVICS R R, PISHCHULOV G. Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings: a classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis [J]. Omega, 2015, 51 (C): 11-23.
[43] 胡湘洪. 基于数据包络分析的质量管理人才投入产出效率研究 [D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2017.
[44] ROSENTHAL E C, WEISS H J. A data envelopment analysis approach for ranking journals [J]. Omega, 2017, 70 (C): 135-147.
[45] ORTEGA F J, GAVILAN J M. The measurement of production efficiency in scientific journals through stochastic frontier analysis models:Application to quantitative economics journals [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7 (04): 959-965.
[46] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2 (06): 429-444.
[47] 张垒. 期刊知识交流效率及影响因素分析: 基于DEA_Tobit两阶段法 [J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33 (04): 516-521, 615.
[48] 张冉, 冉伦, 李金林, 等. 基于两阶段DEA Leader-Follower模型的固定成本分步分摊方法研究 [J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32 (03): 279-288.
[49] XIANG-YANG S, LI Z, QI-GANG L. An approach for evaluating journals of universities or colleges based upon multi-layer efficiency DEA [J]. Physics Procedia, 2012 (25): 678-686.
[50] 任娟. 基于博弈DEA的竞争战略识别研究 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29 (04): 102-108.
[51] 吴美琴, 李常洪, 宋雅文, 等. 基于窗口分析与松弛变量测度的期刊引证效率评价: 18种图情期刊效率差异分析 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40 (02): 122-127.
[52] 郑万腾, 刘秀萍, 李雨蒙. 基于超效率DEA-Malmquist的学术期刊知识交流效率评价: 以图书情报类核心期刊为例 [J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2019 (05): 65-69.
[53] 王惠, 王树乔. 图书情报类期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究 [J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35 (03): 134-138, 156.
[54] AIGNER D, LOVELL C, SCHMIDT P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models [J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, 6 (01): 21-37.
[55] 高振, 冯国珍, 焦玥. 中国实体零售企业运营效率及其影响因素研究: 基于随机前沿分析方法 [J]. 商业经济与管理, 2019 (07): 18-28.
[56] 万莉, 程慧平, 程玉清. 基于随机前沿分析方法的学术期刊知识交流效率研究 [J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37 (06): 68-71, 79.
[57] AN Q X, CHEN H X, WU J, et al. Measuring slacks-based efficiency for commercial banks in China by using a two-stage DEA model with undesirable output [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 235 (01): 13-35.
[58] RUGGIERO J. A comparison of DEA and the stochastic frontier model using panel data [J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2007, 14 (03): 259-266.
[59] 朱金龙, 朱卫未, 宋福明. 基于主成分分析-随机前沿分析模型的江苏高校协同创新中心建设效率分析 [J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39 (11): 129-138.
[60] 程慧平. 基于DEA和SFA方法的信息服务业技术效率研究 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34 (04): 28-34.
[61] 朱红涛. 知识发送者因素对知识交流效率的影响研究 [J]. 图书情报工作网刊, 2012 (06): 9-14.
[62] 吕鸿江, 程明, 吴利华. 知识交流深度与广度的匹配对知识网络交流效率的影响: 基于整体知识网络结构特征的分析 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2018, 32 (01): 84-92.
[63] KIM Y J, HOLLINGSHEAD A B. Online social influence: Past, present, and future [J]. Communication Yearbook, 2015, 39 (01): 163-192.
[64] WALTHER J B, JANG J W. Communication processes in participatory websites [J]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2012, 18 (01): 2-15.
[65] LI X X, BAI Y, KANG Y F. Exploring the social influence of Kaggle virtual community on the M5 competition [J/OL]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349703993_Exploring_the_social_influence_of_
Kaggle_virtual_community_on_the_M5_competition, arXiv preprint, 2021: 1-22.
[66] 汤刚强. 网络学术社区学科关系社会网络研究: 以“科学网”为例 [D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2015.
[67] 刘雨农, 刘敏榕. 虚拟知识社区的社会网络结构及影响因素: 以知乎网为例 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62 (04): 89-96.
[68] 王学东, 杜晓曦, 石自更. 面向学术博客知识交流的社会网络中心性分析 [J]. 情报科学, 2013, 31 (03): 3-8, 16.
[69] COWAN R, JONARD N. Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2004, 28 (08): 1557-1575.
[70] 胡平波, 凌和良. 基于BP网络模型的网络组织中知识共享效率评价 [J]. 情报杂志, 2009, 28 (09): 78-82.
[71] 郑展, 郑康. 加权RIN知识流动效率测度研究 [J]. 软科学, 2009, 23 (04): 69-71, 91.
[72] 吕鸿江, 吴亮, 周应堂. 信任与惩罚机制匹配的知识网络交流效率研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39 (08): 151-160.
[73] 李晓利, 杨育, 杨洁, 等. 知识共享效率的R-RNN评价模型研究及应用 [J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45 (10): 226-230.
[74] 胡德华, 张又月, 罗爱静. 基于遗传投影寻踪算法的学术虚拟社区知识交流效率研究 [J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019, 39 (04): 67-73, 83.
[75] 万莉. 学术期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究 [J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017, 28 (12): 1160-1165.