•  
  •  
 

Scientific Information Research

Keywords

knowledge services; historical evolution; thematic relevance; association structure; social network analysis(SNA)

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]The comprehensive and accurate visual disclosure and comparative analysis of domestic and foreign knowledge service research will help to further improve the basic theoretical framework in this field,so as to better provide suggestions and help for the research and practice of knowledge service in the new era.[Method/process]On the basis of combing the important branches and main links of the domestic and foreign knowledge service research system,the historical evolution of knowledge service research topics at home and abroad is showed.Then,this paper literature on "Knowledge Services" from the WOS database and CNKI database from 2000 to 2021 was selected,and keywords co-occurrence network was extracted.And the new SLM algorithm is used to detect the thematic community,and the distribution of the research is organized.At the same time,the Social Network Analysis method is embedded to quantitatively evaluate the maturity and internal and external relevance of the thematic community.[Result/conclusion]Foreign knowledge services research has formed three types of themed communities:Knowledge application communities,Knowledge framework communities and Management communities.While domestic knowledge services research has formed five thematic communities:Service communities,Library communities,Publishing communities,Knowledge Management communities and Discipline communities.At present,still some problems in the research of knowledge service at home and abroad,such as the research topics are too concentrated and need to be developed and extended;the Theme Evolution context is intermittent,and there is an urgent need for sharing and interconnection;emerging themes are difficult to highlight and need cross integration.

First Page

26

Reference

[1] 麦淑平,刘泉,李珊,等.图书馆知识服务发展历程概述及趋势探讨[J].现代情报,2010,30(07):66-68.
[2] 马国振,候继仓.知识服务模式研究综述[J].图书馆学刊,2012,34(03):140-142.
[3] 钟莹,麦淑平,莫煊海,等.国内外知识服务研究对比分析[J].情报理论与实践,2011,34(05):110-114,125.
[4] 陈景增.知识经济环境下的图书馆知识服务[J].情报科学,2000(07):622-624.
[5] 孙震,冷伏海,张晋辉.基于知识元的科学计量方法及其实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(23):89-99.
[6] 张红丽,吴新年.知识服务及其特征分析[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(03):23-27.
[7] 王璞,邓婉昕,刘芳,等.国外医院图书馆知识服务发展初探[J].图书馆理论与实践,2016(01):6-11.
[8] 毕强.面向知识服务的知识组织研究的重要成果:简评《面向知识服务的知识组织理论与方法》[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(19):146-149.
[9] 戴光强.医学从技术服务扩大到知识服务:医学发展的新纪元[J].中国健康教育,1994(01):4-6.
[10] 李晓鹏,颜端武,陈祖香.国内外知识服务研究现状、趋势与主要学术观点[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(06):107-111.
[11] SUNG KYUNG T.Competitive advantage of IT and effects on strategy and structure:Knowledge-intensive vs manufacturing industries[J].International Journal of Technology Management,2008,41(03/04):359-378.
[12] CHEN H J,MAO Y X,ZHENG X Q,et al.Towards Semantic e-Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].BMC Bioinformatics,2007,8(03):1-16.
[13] 蒋勋,朱晓峰.大数据环境下领域知识组织的发展与展望[J].科技情报研究,2022,4(02):29-36.
[14] 朱晓峰,葛锐,蒋勋.国外政府数据开放研究的主题关联结构与演化态势[J].情报科学,2022,40(01):109-120.
[15] BEHNAM M,SATO M,BAKER B J,et al.Connecting customer knowledge management and intention to use sport services through psychological involvement, commitment,and customer perceived value[J].Journal of Sport Management,2020,34(06):591-603.
[16] PAPI M,HAKIM A,BAHRAMI H.Relationship between knowledge and skill for basic life support in personnel of emergency medical services,Islamic Republic of Iran[J].Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal,2019,26(10):1193-1199.
[17] MZINGWANE M L,MAVONDO G A,MANTULA F,et al.HIV knowledge,risky behaviours and public health care services attendance among adolescents from the Grassroot soccer Zimbabwe programme[J].BMC Health Services Research,2020,20(01):1123-1141.
[18] CHEN T,ZHANG S J,WANG Y,et al.Construction methods of knowledge mapping for full service power data semantic search system[J].Journal of Signal Processing Systems,2020,93(02-03):275-284.
[19] LIN Y H,CHEN Y S.Determinants of green competitive advantage:the roles of green knowledge sharing,green dynamic capabilities,and green service innovation[J].Quality and Quantity:International Journal of Methodology,2017,51(04):1663-1685.
[20] 夏登武.融媒体环境下科技期刊知识服务模式建构与能力提升[J].中国科技期刊研究,2021,32(02):247-253.
[21] 朱晓峰,葛锐,盛天祺.四十年来我国情报学研究的学术变迁与学理支撑[J].科技情报研究,2022,4(02):1-14.
[22] 苏君华,宋帆帆.档案馆知识协同:内涵、产生机制和运行模式[J].档案学研究,2018(03):56-60.
[23] 程刚.大数据环境下科技型中小企业创新发展的知识服务体系研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(03):42-46.
[24] 李冬冬,宋拓,毕思达.用户信息行为与个性化知识服务关联性分析[J].情报科学,2014,32(08):140-143.
[25] 王红.基于云计算的泛在图书馆个性化知识服务模式探讨[J].情报科学,2012,30(08):1196-1199,1257.
[26] 王天泥.知识咨询:大数据时代图书馆的知识服务增长点[J].图书与情报,2013(02):74-77.
[27] 刘海鸥.面向云计算的大数据知识服务情景化推荐[J].图书馆建设,2014(07):31-35.
[28] 杨金花.传统出版企业知识服务转型路径探析[J].科技与出版,2018(05):140-144.
[29] 郝杰.基于云计算技术的学科知识服务平台构建研究[J].图书馆建设,2020(S1):92-95.

Share

COinS