Scientific Information Research
Keywords
information science; Chinese information science; information work; topics research; features research; LDA thematic modeling; Mixed research method
Abstract
[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to analyze the characteristics presented by Chinese information science research during the forty years between 1979-2019, so as to form an objective understanding of the development of Chinese information science. [Method/process]This paper collects 46 252 journal articles on information science and intelligence work included in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), takes their titles, abstracts and keywords as the corpus, and identifies the formation of 26 research themes in Chinese information science through the construction of the LDA theme model, and based on this data, and combining with the background knowledge of the development of Chinese information science, analyzes the characteristics and progress of Chinese information science research in the light of the four aspects of these research papers: the content of the study, the research targets, the characteristics embodied in the research results, and the research of information science itself. [Result/conclusion] From the perspective of content, papers in Chinese information science journals can be summarized as six major research topics; From the perspective of objects, the term information remains the most core concept in Chinese information research, with literature, journals, and papers being important research objects, and knowledge and data gradually being incorporated into the research scope; From the perspective of achievements, significant achievements have been made in literature analysis and research, information analysis and data analysis, knowledge organization and expression; and evaluation, core screening, and hotspot identification are the main application forms of Chinese information research achievements; From the perspective of research on the discipline itself, Chinese information science needs to pay more attention to theoretical practice and education.
First Page
10
Last Page
25
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2024.03.002
Recommended Citation
ZHOU, Xiaoying and PEI, Junliang
(2024)
"Forty Years of Chinese Information Science (1979-2019):Analysis of Research Themes and Characteristics Based on Journal Papers,"
Scientific Information Research: Vol. 6:
Iss.
3, Article 2.
DOI: 10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2024.03.002
Available at:
https://eng.kjqbyj.com/journal/vol6/iss3/2
Reference
[1] 严怡民.建国四十年来我国情报学理论的发展历程[J].图书与情报,1989(03):1-6.
[2] 张新华.情报学的历史进程和发展方向(下)[J].情报学刊,1989(01):18-22.
[3] 张玲玲,倪波.情报学发展历程[J].图书与情报,1999(04):12-14.
[4] 宗乾进,袁勤俭,沈洪洲,等.2001—2010年国内情报学研究回顾与展望:基于知识图谱的当代学科发展动向研究[J].情报资料工作,2012(01):10-15.
[5] 邱均平,周春雷,杨思洛.改革开放30年来我国情报学研究的回顾与展望(三):情报学的发展阶段及趋势分析[J].图书情报研究,2009,2(03):1-9.
[6] 邱均平,王宏鑫,冯新霞.《情报学报》与我国情报学发展(Ⅱ):《情报学报》创刊20年来引用文献的计量分析[J].情报学报,2002(06):642-655.
[7] 孙慧云.改革开放以来我国情报学发展脉络:基于情报学论文的分析研究[J].图书情报导刊,2017,2(09):47-55.
[8] 常李艳,华薇娜.从基金论文看我国情报学的发展[J].新世纪图书馆,2009(01):6-10.
[9] PAPADIMITRIOU C H,TAMAKI H,RAGHAVAN P,et al.Latent semantic indexing:A probabilistic analysis[C]//Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems,Berkeley:Univ Calif Berkeley,1998:159-168.
[10] BLEI D M,NG A Y,JORDAN M I.Latent dirichlet allocation[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003(03):993-1022.
[11] 朱茂然,王奕磊,高松,等.基于LDA模型的主题演化分析:以情报学文献为例[J].北京工业大学学报,2018,44(07):1047-1053.
[12] 邓淑卿,徐健.我国情报学研究主题内容分析[J].情报科学,2017,35(11):83-88.
[13] 马秀峰,郭顺利,宋凯.基于LDA主题模型的“内容-方法”共现分析研究:以情报学领域为例[J].情报科学,2018,36(04):69-74.
[14] 林丽丽,马秀峰.基于LDA模型的国内图书情报学研究主题发现及演化分析[J].情报科学,2019,37(12):87-92.
[15] 关鹏,王曰芬.科技情报分析中LDA主题模型最优主题数确定方法研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2016,(09):42-50.
[16] TEH Y W,JORDAN M I,BEAL M J,et al.Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,2006(101):1566-1581.
[17] GRIFFITHS T L,STEYVERS M.Finding Scientific Topics[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2004,101(S1):5228-5235.
[18] 王婷婷,韩满,王宇.LDA模型的优化及其主题数量选择研究:以科技文献为例[J].数据分析与知识发现,2018,2(01):29-40.
[19] 吴查科,王树义.基于LDA的国内图书馆学研究主题发现及演化研究[J].新世纪图书馆,2019(07):90-96.
[20] 单斌,李芳.基于LDA话题演化研究方法综述[J].中文信息学报,2010,24(06):43-49,68.
[21] 周晓英,陈燕方.中国情报学研究范式的冲突与思考[J].公安学研究,2019,2(02):27-44,123.
[22] 王琳,赖茂生.中国科技情报事业回顾与展望:基于情报学理论的视角[J].中国图书馆学报,2021,47(04):28-47.
[23] 文庭孝,龚蛟腾.论情报学研究对象的变革及其学科发展[J].情报资料工作,2004(05):5-7,13.
[24] 李后卿,柳晓春.图书情报学理论基础中的知识论研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2003(01):81-83.
[25] 肖勇.情报学研究趋势[J].情报学进展,2004,5(00):1-41.
[26] 王琳.数字化时代情报学理论的研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(02):9-13.
[27] 马费成,宋恩梅.情报学的历史沿革与研究进展[M]//查先进,李纲,唐晓波.情报学研究进展.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007:1-34.
[28] 周晓英.情报学进展系列论文之五 知识网络、知识链接和知识服务研究[J].情报资料工作,2010(02):5-10.
[29] 张新民,梁战平.情报学学科发展研究[J].情报学进展,2008,7(00):1-54.
[30] 周晓英.情报学进展系列论文之七 数据密集型科学研究范式的兴起与情报学的应对[J].情报资料工作,2012,(02):5-11.
[31] 王正兴.观点 事实 思考:对“图书情报一体化”几个征题的应答[J].情报杂志,1989(01):66-70.
[32] 赖茂生.新环境、新范式、新方法、新能力:新时代情报学发展的思考[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(12):1-5.
[33] 苏新宁.不忘初心、牢记使命 展望情报学与情报工作的未来[J].科技情报研究,2019,01(01):1-12.
[34] 张勤.情报学理论研究视野及模式探讨[J].图书情报知识,2004(02):7-11.
[35] 马费成.凝聚共识,推动信息资源管理一级学科建设[J].信息资源管理学报,2023,13(01):4-8.
[36] 王知津.数智时代情报学学科体系构建[J].情报理论与实践,2024,47(03):1-15.
[37] 李树青,苏震,蒋伟伟,等.学科研究对象演化视角下的情报学教育定位研究[J].科技情报研究,2021,3(03):1-16.
[38] 陈丝雨,朱晓峰,蒋旭牧.我国情报学教育研究的纵向演进与横向关联[J].科技情报研究,2023,5(01):12-27.
[39] 周晓英,崔佳佳,唐宇萍,等.情报学的起源与方向:从布什的《诚如所思》谈起[J].情报科学,2004,(02):129-132.
[40] 周晓英.情报学的形成和定位[J].情报资料工作,2006,(02):5-10.
[41] 丁波涛.人工智能时代的情报学发展与创新:基于情报交流理论的视角[J].情报学报,2021,40(03):321-332.
[42] 丁晓蔚,李树青,胡桓.先进信息技术驱动的情报学研究内容和方法变化及思考[J].图书与情报,2021(05):123-127.
[43] 李辉,谭晓,杨建林.数智技术赋能科技情报流程现代化:驱动因素、核心价值与践行路向[J].科技情报研究,2023,5(04):32-41.