Journal of Scientific Information Research
Keywords
rural public cultural services; public digital culture; accessibility factor; AISM; FMICMAC; grounnded theory
Abstract
[Purpose/significance] A structural analysis of the stratified dependencies among accessibility determinants in rural public digital cultural ecosystems enables identification of pivotal developmental nodes, thereby establishing theoretical foundations for optimizing service delivery mechanisms and achieving spatial equilibrium in digital cultural provision. [Method/process] This study applies grounded theory to conduct a comprehensive coding analysis of policy documents related to China's rural public digital cultural services. Through this process, five dimensions and fifteen sub-components of accessibility are identified. An index system for accessibility factors is then developed using the AISM approach. The identified elements are classified into three hierarchical levels. To further validate the system and explore the overall influence and interaction mechanisms of these factors in the context of rural public digital cultural services, the FMICMAC method is employed for in-depth verification and analysis. [Result / conclusion] Researches show that: rich service facilities and diverse cultural resources are core deep elements dominating the system. Readily available service information and interactive service experiences constitute the superficial-level elements of service interaction. These elements act as crucial benchmarks for assessing the alignment between supply and demand in public digital cultural services. Consequently, to improve the accessibility of rural public digital cultural services, a three-tiered strategy is necessary, which takes into account both the hierarchical structure and the composition of these elements.
First Page
57
Last Page
65
Submission Date
March 2025
Revision Date
April 2025
Acceptance Date
April 2025
Publication Date
January 2026
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
ꎺ 10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2026.01.006
Recommended Citation
PENG, Lihui; GU, Banruo; HONG, Chuang; and HU, Xisheng
(2026)
"Research on the Accessibility Elements of Rural Public Digital Cultural Services Based on AISM-FMICMAC,"
Journal of Scientific Information Research: Vol. 8:
Iss.
1, Article 6.
DOI: ꎺ 10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2026.01.006
Available at:
https://eng.kjqbyj.com/journal/vol8/iss1/6
Reference
[1] 新华社.中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第四次全体会议公报[EB/OL].(2019-10-31)[2025-03-01].https://www.12371.cn/2019/10/31/ARTI1572515554956816.shtml.
[2] 文化和旅游部.“十四五”公共文化服务体系建设规划 [EB/OL].(2021-06-10)[2025-03-01].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-06/23/content_5620456.htm.
[3] 新华网.习近平:高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗:在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].(2022-10-25)[2024-3-15].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.
[4] 倪标,黄伟.基于对抗解释结构模型的军事训练方法可推广性评价模型[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2020,34(2):46-51.
[5] ANDERSEN R.Behavioral Model of Families Use of Health Services[M].Chicago:Center for Health Administration Studies,University of Chicago,1968.
[6] 王前,吴理财.公共文化服务可及性评价研究:经验借鉴与框架建构[J].上海行政学院学报,2015,16(3):53-59.
[7] 单轸,陈雅.我国公共文化服务可及性提升机制研究:基于政策文本的扎根分析[J].情报科学,2023,41(7):153-162.
[8] 戴艳清,胡逸夫.公共数字文化服务可及性要素研究[J].图书情报工作,2022,66(16):57-68.
[9] 朱盛艳,李瑞琴.基本公共服务可获得性的农村贫困效应检验:基于增长效应与分配效应的双重审视[J].农村经济,2019(8):60-67.
[10] 罗娟.过程型逻辑:数字乡村建设背景下农村公共文化服务可及性的实现机制[J].农村经济,2022(10):82-90.
[11] 冯献,李瑾.乡村公共文化服务可及性:指标体系设计与评价应用[J].图书馆,2020(11):20-26,32.
[12] 朱莉.可及性:一个公众感知视角下图书馆服务评价的新体系[J].图书与情报,2021(4):113-119.
[13] 马文飞,丁媛.高校图书馆阅读推广可及性评价研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2020,(10):61-67.
[14] 陈瑜.新时代农村公共文化服务可及性提升研究:体系分析与实践向度[J].图书馆,2023(7):1-9.
[15] 王前.农家书屋服务“可及性”评价研究[J].图书馆建设,2015(4):34-38.
[16] SENKEVITCH J,WOLFRAM D.Equalizing Access to Electronic Networked Resources:A Model for Rural Libraries in the United States[J].library trends,1994,42(4):661-675.
[17] 郎平.数字农家书屋公共文化服务的“可及性”检视及其完善路径[J].图书馆理论与实践,2024(1):44-50.
[18] 完颜邓邓,童雨萱.供需匹配视角下国外公共数字文化资源整合平台服务方式调查分析[J].图书馆建设,2022(5):124-131.
[19] GRUNDNER T.Seizing the infosphere:an alternative vision for national computer networking[C]//International Networking Conference 1993,San Francisco:1993,210-216.
[20] 王锰,华钰文,陈雅.S-O-R理论视角下东部地区乡村公共数字文化服务用户流失行为研究[J].图书馆杂志,2022,41(2):36-46.
[21] 郭亚军,李帅,丁菲,等.美国大学图书馆的虚拟仿真应用实践:对美国TOP100大学图书馆VR/AR应用的调查[J].图书馆论坛,2022,42(4):133-140.
[22] 郭清玥,吴丹,甘蒂.汉藏双语公共数字文化服务效能的制约因素与提升策略[J].图书情报工作,2022,66(13):25-35.
[23] 寇垠,刘杰磊.东部农村居民公共文化服务满意度及其影响因素[J].图书馆论坛,2019,39(11):79-86.
[24] 李少惠,余君萍.公共治理视野下我国农村公共文化服务绩效评估研究[J].图书与情报,2009(6):51-54,87.
[25] TOMASEVSKI K.Preliminary report of the special rapporteur on the right to education[EB/OL].(1999-08-09)[2025-03-01].http://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1487535.
[26] PECHANSKY R,THOMAS W J.The Concept of Access:Definition and Relationship to Consumer Satisfaction[J].Medical Care,1981,19:127-140.
[27] 包维娜.乡村公共数字文化服务可及性评价指标体系构建和应用研究[D].镇江:江苏大学,2023.
[28] 戴艳清,胡逸夫.公共数字文化服务可及性要素研究[J].图书情报工作,2022,66(16):57-68.
[29] 洪闯,文沙.农村公共数字文化服务可及性影响因素与关联路径研究[J].图书馆学研究,2025(3):21-34,41.
[30] 王文韬,钱鹏博,干毓翎,等.高校图书馆用户体验影响因素关联机理与传导路径:基于ADSM-MICMAC模型的演化[J].图书馆学研究,2022(12):54-66.
[31] DUPERRIN J C,GODET M.SMIC 74-A method for constructing and ranking scenarios[J].Futures,1975,7(4):302-312.